• Funding Available Monarchs and Pollinators, and… Ashley Langreck AgriNews Publications
• What Makes Areas Near a Tree Inhospitable for the Survival of its Seedlings
INDIANAPOLIS — The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, along with Pheasants and Quail Forever, recently announced they are accepting applications for funding for farmers and landowners interested in establishing habitats for monarch butterflies, pollinators and other wildlife.
Jerry Roach, the assistant state conservationist for programs with Indiana NRCS, said march numbers have been declining over the years, which is why NRCS is making a push to develop habitats for monarchs, as well as other pollinators, throughout Indiana.
The funding is available through a multi-state Regional Conservation Partnership Program, which allocates funding to help with establishing habitat efforts.
Roach said individuals can use the funding to plant certain species of plants, such as milkweed, which monarch butterflies are attracted to.
“We are glad to provide this opportunity to landowners and farmers,” Roach said.
Roach said this program isn’t just for landowners who are wanting to attract monarchs, but other pollinators, as well.
Applications are due by Aug. 9, and more information can be found at tinyurl.com/y3wcjsqp.
Picky pathogens help non-native tree species invade
Ecological Society of America
Walk into a forest made of only native trees, and you probably notice many different tree species around you, with no one species dominating the ecosystem. Such biodiversity – the variety of life and species in the forest – ensures that each species gets a role to play in the ecosystem, boosting forest health and productivity. However, when non-native trees invade, they form dense groups of a single species of tree. This bucks conventional wisdom because, in theory, pathogens – microscopic disease-causing organisms – should prevent this from happening.
Trees have many natural enemies, such as herbivores and insects that nibble on their leaves. But their main foes are invisible to the naked eye. In older forests especially, fungal pathogens evolve to attack the seedlings of certain tree species and, over time, accumulate in the soils around the adults, hindering the growth of their seeds. Seeds that fall far away from their parent typically survive better. The pathogens thus help dictate where native trees can grow and prevent some species from dominating others.
This effect is part of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis, a widely accepted explanation for the promotion of biodiversity in forests. The theory was developed in the 1970s by ecologists Daniel Janzen and Joseph Connell, who said that species-specific herbivores, pathogens, or other natural enemies make the areas near a tree inhospitable for the survival of its seedlings. If one species becomes too abundant, there will be few safe places for its seedlings to survive, thus promoting the growth of other plant species within one area.
Why, then, do introduced tree species often invade, outcompete, and displace native trees, even those of the same genus? The subject is the focus of a new study published in the Ecological Society of America’s journal Ecosphere.
Aleksandra Wróbel, a PhD candidate in the Department of Systematic Zoology at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poland, says that the relationship between native trees and their enemy pathogens is a tightly co-evolved one; so tight, in fact, that pathogens may not be able to recognize or attack even closely-related introduced tree species. “Enemy-release” theory states that because introduced species are new to the ecosystem, they do not have enemies yet in the soil, and their seeds can fall densely and thrive, becoming invasive. This relaxation of the Janzen-Connell effect, says Wróbel, “gives non-native species a big competitive advantage over native species.”
To test how the intensity of the effect differs between tree species of a same genus, Wróbel and colleagues use greenhouse and field experiments to study two pairs of invasive and native tree species in Central Europe: boxelder (Acer negundo) vs. Norway maple (Acer platanoides), and Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) vs. pedunculate oak (Quercus robur). They also conduct surveys of natural forests containing populations of all four species to investigate their survival in an uncontrolled environment.
Under controlled conditions, the invasive species of both pairs fare better than their respective native cousins, avoiding attack by soil pathogens; they are released from the Janzen-Connell effect, giving them the survival advantage. However, under natural conditions, one genus pair (Acer) followed the expected pattern, with non-native seedlings escaping pathogen attack, while the other pair (Quercus) did not. Wróbel chalks this up to the complexity of interactions with other plants and animals that tree seedlings experience in the wild.
This study indicates that freedom from disease partially explains why non-native tree species dominate in areas where they are introduced. Improving understanding of the role that plant-soil interactions play in the establishment and spread of invasive plants is critical for developing effective management and control strategies.
“Figuring out why invasive species are able to proliferate so readily in new areas is one of the most important issues in ecology and nature protection,” concludes Wróbel, “and the results of our research provide additional insight into the factors responsible for the success of certain non-native species.”
Wróbel, Aleksandra, et al. 2019. “Differential impacts of soil microbes on native and co?occurring invasive tree species.” Ecosphere. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2802